Following WWDC 2021, here’s a look at the updated source leaderboard and where the best (and worse) Apple sources place.
Sources that increased their credibility
🏀 Mark Gurman: 89.1% accurate (was 88.7)
🌙 L0vetodream: 88.8% accurate (was 88)
🕘 9to5Mac: 78.7% accurate (was 78.5)
🗞 The Wall Street Journal: 80% accurate (was 77.4)
Sources that decreased their credibility
🧻 Jon Prosser: 73.6% accurate (was 78.1)
🌳 Wedbush: 69.2% accurate (was 72)
🧭 Macotakara: 64.4% accurate (was 66.2)
✅ The Verifier: 54.7% accurate (was 55.3)
Note: As you may have noticed, no source is perfect. That’s because even the best get some info right and some info wrong: do not harass anyone for their track record. The leaderboard functionality on AppleTrack is here only to help tech enthusiasts better understand how likely a rumor really is.
As always, if you notice a discrepancy on someone’s record, let us know.
Leave a Reply