WWDC 2021 leaderboard update: this is where the best (and worst) Apple sources stand

Following WWDC 2021, here’s a look at the updated source leaderboard and where the best (and worse) Apple sources place.

Sources that increased their credibility

πŸ€ Mark Gurman: 89.1% accurate (was 88.7)

πŸŒ™ L0vetodream: 88.8% accurate (was 88)

πŸ•˜ 9to5Mac: 78.7% accurate (was 78.5)

πŸ—ž The Wall Street Journal: 80% accurate (was 77.4)

Sources that decreased their credibility

🧻 Jon Prosser: 73.6% accurate (was 78.1)

🌳 Wedbush: 69.2% accurate (was 72)

🧭 Macotakara: 64.4% accurate (was 66.2)

βœ… The Verifier: 54.7% accurate (was 55.3)

Note: As you may have noticed, no source is perfect. That’s because even the best get some info right and some info wrong: do not harass anyone for their track record. The leaderboard functionality on AppleTrack is here only to help tech enthusiasts better understand how likely a rumor really is.

As always, if you notice a discrepancy on someone’s record, let us know.