Following Apple’s ‘Spring Loaded’ presentation in Cupertino on Tuesday, we take a look at which sources went up…and the leakers that went down. It’s time for a leaderboard update.
Sources that got more accurate
- 🕘 9to5Mac: 77.2 ⮕ 78.5% accurate
- 🔢 DigiTimes: 61.8 ⮕ 63.5% accurate
- 💵 EDN: 34.1 ⮕ 38.6% accurate
- 🧻 Jon Prosser: 77.5 ⮕ 78.6% accurate
- ❓ MacRumors: 71.9 ⮕ 78% accurate
- 🍍 Max Weinbach: 67.4 ⮕ 68.1% accurate
- 👨💻 Ming-Chi Kuo: 75 ⮕ 76.6% accurate
- ✅ The Verifier: 54.3 ⮕ 55.3% accurate
- 🖥 Sonny Dickson: 57.7 ⮕ 71.4% accurate
Sources that got less accurate
- 🧧 Kang: 97 ⮕ 96.3% accurate
- 🧭 Macotakara: 76.6 ⮕ 66.2% accurate
- 🏀 Mark Gurman: 89.1 ⮕ 88.7% accurate
- 🌳 Wedbush: 78.6 ⮕ 72% accurate
Note: As you may have noticed, no source is perfect. That’s because even the best get some info right and some info wrong: do not harass anyone for their track record. The leaderboard functionality on AppleTrack is here only to help tech enthusiasts better understand how likely a rumor really is.
As always, if you notice a discrepancy on someone’s record, let us know.